KEY DECISION 01
Understand the financial system before designing it
What I didSpent significant time with SMEs, analysts, risk leaders and executives to learn not only what information had to appear, but how it related and how teams used it to make decisions.
Why it matteredSimplifying a risk interface without understanding the system could easily remove context users depended on.
KEY DECISION 02
Make dense data easier to interpret, without oversimplifying
What I didFor Intraday P&L, I refined hierarchy, layouts, workflows, tables and visualization patterns so key information surfaced faster and related data felt connected.
Why it matteredIn a time-sensitive risk environment, usability is less about making a screen look simple and more about showing what deserves attention.
KEY DECISION 03
Design a new risk experience from the system outward
What I didFor Stress Testing & Liquidity Risk, I mapped relationships between data, workflows, system states and tasks, then turned them into an interaction model and implementation-ready UI, iterating as requirements evolved.
Why it matteredThe challenge wasn’t individual screens. It was a coherent structure for a complicated financial system.